Friday 28 October 2011

We're Moving!

It's our 1st birthday  today and it seems like a good time to announce the launch of.....
 


Yes, Read It Ribbit is having a makeover and we're moving to Wordpress! (Click on the link above to see the new site)

We'll still be posting all the news, features and reviews that you enjoy but  we'll be making it bigger and better than ever before. 

All the old content will remain here at blogspot as an archive but from now on in, all new content will be posted on wordpress.

Thanks for sticking with us for our inaugural year. We hope to see you over there soon for the latest Cheat Sheet (which will be published on the last day of each month) and more.


Hannah


Tuesday 18 October 2011

Julian Barnes Wins Man Booker Prize 2011

Photo by Tim Valentine
After four nominations, Julian Barnes has finally won the Booker Prize 2011 for his latest novel, The Sense of an Ending.

The novella has been praised for it's portrayal of the fluidity of human memories and ageing. Narrator, Tony Webster, is forced to re-evaluate his youthful memories when he is bequeathed an old friend's diary.

This year's panel  has faced some controversy for the populist tone of it's list. The Man Booker has traditonally been associated with so called Literary Fiction. Head of this year's judging panel, Dame Stella Rimington, has been repeatedly forced to defend her panel's decisions: a fact she alluded to in her speech as she presented this year's award.

Despite criticism from some corners, the shortlist has proved to be wildly popular with readers, breaking previous year's figures to be the best selling Booker shortlist ever.

Barnes was awarded the £50,000 prize at a ceremony tonight at the London Guild Hall.


Sunday 16 October 2011

News Roundup

A very Brtish news round up. Photo by Matt Callow
Howdy Book Lovers!

For those of you who are new to the blog, welcome! For all the returning readers, thanks for coming back.

Read It Ribbit's posting may go a bit quiet in the next few weeks, but that's only because I'm working on some big changes at the moment (watch this space for more info). I'm also putting together some more regular features as the Cheat Sheet seems to have taken off. What do you lot think? Is there anything you'd like us to cover more often? Send us a suggestion in the comments box at the bottom of this post an we'll try to accommodate.

And now for the news roundup:

1)The Book Vow: (see my earlier posts)
Was going exceedingly swimmingly, then I started a course and now I'm bogged down with text books. I am, however, still ploughing away (although at a much reduced rate)at the books on  my shelf I haven't yet read. We're down to around six now and although I'd love to say they'll all be finished by Christmas, I'm being realistic. However, I've decided that the project will end with the year 2011 and I'll once again start buying and consuming library books at my usual rate. So there may be one or two left over on the shelves, but I think a year of a book addict resisting temptation (all be it with a minor hiccup at the Hay Festival where I bought 3 new books but am yet to read said items) is pretty good going.

2) The Nobel Prize for Literature...
This year, the award was given to Tomas Tranströmer, a Swedish poet who's works have been translated into over fifty different languages. If you want to find out more about this years prize, see the Nobel webpage

3) Haruki Murakami's IQ84 is almost here!
British Murakami fans won't have to wait much longer as his much lauded magnum opus IQ84 is due for imminent release in it's various volumes. A million copies of books 1 and 2 were sold within one month when they were published in Japan. Unlike the Japanese, UK readers won't have to wait nearly as long to get their hands on the entire novel as book three is being published a week after the combined books one and two, hit the shelves next week.

4) And now for something unexpected...
Pulp frontman Jarvis Cocker has been named as editor-at-large for Faber and Faber and will take on commissioning duties for the publishing house. Cocker is set to become a published author himself with the release of his first book, Mother, Brother, Lover next week through Faber and Faber. 

Thursday 29 September 2011

Super Thursday


The biggest day in the publishing calendar has rolled around once more: Super Thursday is here again. ‘Super Thursday’ has become a staple of the British publishing landscape over the last few years as companies rush to gain those all important Christmas sales.

Over two hundred new hardback titles were released today, flooding bookshops with a host of celebrity autobiographies, fiction and cookery titles which are sure to make this year’s Christmas lists.

In a break from the patterns of the past few years, publishers have staggered some of their autumn releases in a bid to increase sales across the season.

This year’s Super Thursday list includes the latest Jamie Oliver: Jamie’s Great Britain, James Corden’s autobiography, the latest offering from Bernard Cornwell and comedy character Alan Partridge’s autobiography 'I Partridge: We Need to Talk About Alan'.

Book makers are already giving odds on the top sellers this Christmas, with Jamie Oliver and the Guinness Book of Records currently leading the pack according to William Hill.

Saturday 24 September 2011

Cheat Sheet : Jane Eyre




 Welcome to the third in the series of Read It Ribbit's Monthly Cheat Sheets. This month, we've condensed Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre so you'll have an idea what's happening in the Fukunaga adaptation which apparently screws with the plot's timeline. See, book blogs can involve poular culture!












Cheat Sheet 3:  Jane Eyre

Title (s): Jane Eyre

Author  Charlotte Brontë. Originally published under pseudonym Currer Bell.

Who’s Who?
Jane Eyre: The original plain Jane. An orphan brought up by her unfeeling aunt and sent to a cold and often harsh boarding school, Jane uses her intelligence and wit to rise above a potentially damning situation to gain a respectful position as a governess. Jane clings to her morals and her pride in a mostly degenerate world.

Mr (Edward) Rochester: The archetypal leach, Rochester is knocking on the door of middle age but has no problem at all playing mind games with a twenty something without a friend in the world who would be destitute without her job. He acts on impulse with very little care or thought for the consequences of his actions, which leads to many problems later on. Expects his servants to shoulder the burden of his past mistakes.

St John Rivers: Not worth noting except his existence inadvertently explains the mystery of the popular colonial name of Sinjin (for some reason, you pronounce it weirdly). Sinjin is a boring pastor who makes eyes at Jane when she stumbles upon his house after fleeing Thornfield and is taking in by him and his sisters, Mary and Diana.

Bertha Rochester nee Mason: The original mad woman in the attic. Pyromaniac Bertha is probably the most un –PC character within the novel. Much maligned by her husband who locks her away with a carer (Grace Poole) in the Thornfield attics upon discovering she suffers from mental illness. Her brother, Mr Mason, also appears.

Adele Varens: A young French girl who Jane acts as governess to and is the ward of Mr Rochester. Rochester had an affair with her dancer mother Celine several years ago and agreed to act her protector when Celine was dying. It is unknown even to Rochester whether or not he is Adele’s father.

The Reeds: Jane’s cruel relatives with whom she spends her early childhood. After the death of her kindly uncle Reed, the cruelty of her Aunt and her cousins propels her to Lowood school.


What happens then?

The young orphan Jane suffers at the hands of her relatives, the Reed’s , after her uncle's death and is shipped off to Lowood boarding school. Initially a place of great cruelty and hardship, she looses her best friend Helen to consumption but finds kindness and inspiration from her teacher Maria Temple and follows in her footsteps to teach at Lowood for a further two years after completing her own studies.

Wanting a change of scenery, she answers an advert for position as a governess at Thornfield Hall. When Jane eventually encounters the lord of the manor, Mr Rochester, her world turns upside down as the old leach decides to play a game of cat and mouse with her. Blowing hot and cold and dangling nubile young ladies called Blanche in front of poor plain Jane, she is thrown into despair as she realises the only man who has ever paid her any attention is much more likely to fall for a pretty young thing with the right sort of connections over a penniless servant. Rochester’s mind games continue as he dresses up as an old gypsy woman (yep you read that right) and tells her fortune, dropping massive elephant-in-the-room hints to the reader that he’s actually interested in Jane.

 After some too-ing and fro-ing where the pair get closer (including a strange midnight encounter where Rochester asks her to help his mysteriously injured friend Mr Mason) Jane is forced to leave Thornfield when she finds out that her cousin has died and that her aunt Reed is gravely ill. She returns to her family home to bury the hatchet with her surviving cousins and try and smooth things over with the old bag. Before the old bag finally pops her clogs, she gives Jane a three year old letter from another uncle, John Eyre, who it seems was rich and wanted to adopt Jane and give her all his money but the evil old cow didn’t forward the message out of spite so all this time Jane has been none the wiser. (This plot point would never happen these days, what with email and phones, twitter and the legions of determined, kamikaze Harry Potter owls which will get the message to you no matter what in the manner of the Milk Tray Man).

Jane eventually goes back to work where Rochester rips out her heart by telling her he’s marrying Blanche, just after she declares her home is where he is but haha it’s only a joke and he proposes to Jane instead. She says yes, but, unsurprisingly starts getting anxious about it all and strange things like her veil being torn in half don’t help matters. Come the day of wedding and the part where the priest asks if there’s any reason that they shouldn’t get married and Mr Mason re-appears and pipes up that Rochester is married to his sister Bertha. Shock/horror!

In a typically unapologetic outburst, Rochester insists on bringing everyone back to the Thornfield attics to meet Bertha, who’s busy scurrying around, and declares that as she’s mad, he thought no one would mind him becoming a bigamist because he’s suffered enough and marrying Jane would make everything alright…. Hmmmmm. The next day, Rochester suggests that they run away to France and live in sin because he’s not really married as he was ‘tricked’ into marrying a mad woman by his own father for money: a suggestion which, to the staunchly principled Jane with nothing but her honour, is simply not on.

Unsurprisingly, Jane leaves Thornfield and her beloved Rochester behind, wandering the moors until she collapses and is rescued by Sinjin and taken in by the Rivers’. After recuperating, Jane begins to teach in a small village school and before long, it is revealed that she is the sole heir to John Eyre’s fortune and also that she is Sinjin and his sisters’ cousin (and feeling generous, she splits her £20,000 inheritance with her new found family). Sinjin asks her to marry him and become a missionary with him in India. Jane thinks she can hear Rochester calling for her from far away and begins travelling back to Thornfield at the first opportunity, escaping the clammy clutches of Sinjin in the process.

She returns to Thornfield to find the house in ashes after being burnt down by Bertha, who threw herself off the roof during the blaze. She goes in search of Rochester, who was badly injured in the fire, loosing both a hand and his sight. They make up, he proposes and she accepts now that he is free to marry. They live happily ever after, and Rochester even regains his sight enough to see their first born child, awww.


Is there a Film Version?  

Funny you should ask… If you have missed the many television adaptations  (including the rather enjoyable BBC adaptation with Ruth Wilson and Toby Stephens who managed the impossible and made Rochester a sympathetic character) there’s a brand new adaptation in cinemas now so you to can see how plain the makeup and hair department has made a pretty actressjust by gviing her an unflattering hairdo and minimal concealer.

A full list of the various adaptations can be found here http://eyreguide.bravehost.com/


Things the Fans Say


Random Facts

  • Charlotte ‘outed’ her sisters and herself as female, much to Emily’s dismay, when she publicly claimed her work which she had submitted under the male pseudonym Currer Bell. Before that time, the Brontë sisters ahd been writing under their pseudonyms as the Bell brothers.
  • Charlotte wrote to and received a reply from the then Poet Laureate Robert Southey about his views on women who wrote: ‘Literature cannot be the business of a woman's life, and it ought not to be.’ Have you ever heard of him? Miss Brontë, I believe you have been vindicated.

Other Things
  • Jane Eyre also has a much loved and much read prequel which focus on Bertha’s life before Jane meets her. Wide Sargasso Sea by Jean Rhys has also been critically acclaimed and is often studied in tandem with Jane Eyre.

EDIT 4TH NOVEMBER 2011:
ReaditRibbit has moved! Check out the new blog here

Thursday 15 September 2011

Review: Sunnyside- Glen David Gold


I love this cover and all the little Chaplin's
This door wedge sized book has been sat in proof copy edition on my shelf for two years as a remnant of my time as a bookseller.

It’s size is not surprising. It took eight years between the publication of his first novel, Carter Beats the Devil for Glen David Gold to release his second novel. Centring around actor Charlie Chaplin, budding actor and lighthouse keeper’s son Leeland Wheeler and an officious young train engineer Hugo Black and swirling with a host of secondary and minor characters interweaving through the various rich and detailed plots it’s sometimes hard to see what fits where in a novel that stretches across time and topic. Thematically spanning the Hollywood dream, the First World War, absentee parents (in more ways than one), romantic mistakes and dog training it can be quite easy to loose the central arc of the book.

Where the book really shines is the Chaplin storyline. By far the most engaging and coherent of the myriad stories, the book opens with a mass vision across America of Chaplin as his most famous character the tramp.  Leeland spies him cavorting in a rowboat off the coast off the coast of California at the same time that the train Hugo is working on is stopped by an angry mob in Texas who were (for some reason they can’t remember afterwards) awaiting Chaplin’s arrival and throughout various hotels and clubs pages are being put out for the same man. Chaplin himself meanwhile is blissfully unaware of the commotion and daydreaming about his next film. What’s most frustrating about this exciting opening is that it is never properly explained. Gold attests that this incident actually happened in his detailed endnotes but unhelpfully, doesn’t mention from which source he discovered this. More to the point, it acts as an opening but after the initial furore dies down there’s no mention of the most memorable incident in the entire novel.

We follow Chaplin as his career is taking off, through the various relationships leading up to his first marriage and how he copes with the public scorn and his own feelings of guilt when the authorities secretly ban him from taking an active part in World War One outside of morale raising. The scenes that really shine here though are when we see Chaplin in his element. The rich, evocative descriptions of Hollywood parties, film techniques and creative struggle of genius are so very detailed that it is not hard to imagine that Sunnyside is completely biographical. Chaplin himself comes across as a very likeable character with a ready wit and obvious talent that is shrouded in his own eyes by a fear of failure.

Whilst the other characters are likeable enough in their own way, Chaplin is so obviously the protagonist that I kept looking for meaningful links between their stories and his and generally drawing a blank.

Wheeler briefly meets Chaplin but otherwise, his story of blundering boyhood dreams of Hollywood stardom and escaping his overbearing (but well meaning) lighthouse keeper mother, doesn’t pick up until he finds himself fighting in France. After unintentionally ending a marriage, he rescues some Alsatian puppies from certain death and devotes the rest of his stay in France to caring for and training them. It’s unclear at first why events have taken this turn but at least the reader gets the satisfaction of understanding the connection as Leeland’s strand of the story ends (I won’t spoil it as I thought the surprise was a nice twist).

The Hugo Black storyline is even more ponderous. After appearing in the first chapter, he disappears until well over half of the book is done. There’s some good comedy moments as he finds himself driving a steam train through the Russian steppes as part of an isolated American troop and he even gets to meet three deposed princesses but otherwise his presence in the novel seems almost indulgent.  Likewise, the various bit part characters who pop up in between acts to move the narrative on in inventive ways before swiftly ducking out of frame once more (Rebecca Golood being the classic example) are charming enough and suggest a certain connectivity between all the characters but they are somewhat underdeveloped. With repeated appearances especially, I kept expecting the plots of these lesser characters to develop and begin heavily intertwining with the main players, but alas, that never came to pass.

As much as I enjoyed the comedy and the ‘big picture’ writing style of using many characters/actors (in much the same way as a plot of an old Hollywood film) I can’t help but think that Sunnyside needed a heavier hand during the editing process. The many voices can be distracting and confusing, especially when you’re trying to remember who’s related to who. There’s just so much information crammed in here from all the many hours of research that Gold no doubt put in to make this epic sized novel, that the story is quite often overwhelmed by its weight. All in all, it’s a novel with a brilliant premise but one full of internal disconnections which ultimately leads to disappointment.

EDIT 4TH NOVEMBER 2011:
ReaditRibbit has moved! Check out the new blog here

Wednesday 7 September 2011

Man Booker Shortlist 2011 Announced

The shortlist of this year’s Man Booker Prize for fiction was announced yesterday.

As reflected in the long list, a noticeable trend towards unknown authors and small publishing houses has made itself felt in this year’s nominations. Whilst previous nominees Carol Birch and Julian Barnes (the favourite to win) each make it to the shortlist, two of the six nominations go to debut novelists. Meanwhile, four of the six nominated titles were printed by smaller publishing houses: perhaps suggesting a shift in attitudes towards the changing publishing industry.

There’s also a first for this year’s shortlist in the form of Patrick deWitt’s novel The Sisters Brothers, believed to be the first Western to be make it to the coveted top six.

This year, 138 books were marked for consideration before being whittled down to the top six. Head of the judging panel, Dame Stella Rimmington said;  “Inevitably it was hard to whittle down the longlist to six titles. We were sorry to lose some great books. But, when push came to shove, we quickly agreed that these six very different titles were the best.”

The winner of this year’s prize will be announced on October the 18th and in the immediate run up, there will be several author events with the writers of the short listed titles, details of which will be announced in due course on the Man Booker website.


Shortlist
  • Julian Barnes The Sense of an Ending (Jonathan Cape - Random House)
  • Carol Birch Jamrach's Menagerie (Canongate Books)
  • Patrick deWitt The Sisters Brothers (Granta)
  • Esi Edugyan Half Blood Blues (Serpent's Tail)
  • Stephen Kelman Pigeon English (Bloomsbury)
  • A.D. Miller Snowdrops (Atlantic)

Tuesday 30 August 2011

Cheat Sheet : Pride and Prejudice


 
It's time for the next intallment in the Read It Ribbit Cheat Sheet series. This month, it's the turn of the original romantic comedy, my favourite book: Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice
  

Cheat Sheet 2: Pride and Prejudice

Title (s): Pride and Prejudice

Author:  Jane Austen

Who’s Who:
Miss Elizabeth (Lizzy) Bennet : The witty, feisty heroine. The second of the five daughters of Mr Bennet (apathetic with little patience for non sensible people which is a shame because most of his family are) and Mrs Bennet (a gossip and fairly vulgar woman whose aim in life is to marry off her daughters to rich men), Lizzy is determined not to marry for anything but love.

Mr (Fitzwilliam) Darcy: Seemingly arrogant but actually socially awkward. Rich gentleman who falls for Lizzy, mostly against his gentlemanly will and (in his own words) ‘reason’. Smooth Darcy, smooth.

Jane Bennet: the oldest of the Bennet sisters. Commonly described as the prettiest and generally nicest sister. Acts as Lizzy’s confident.
Mary, Kitty and Lydia Bennet: The remaining Bennet sisters, each one sillier than the last.

Mr Bingley: Darcy’s best friend who rents Netherfield Park and in so doing, kick starts the story. Has a soft spot for Jane Bennet.

Mr Collins: Distant cousin of the Bennets and toadying clergyman. Thanks to the practise of the day, he is set to inherit the Bennet’s Longbourne estate, leaving the sisters without independent finances.

Charlotte Lucas: Lizzy’s very sensible and practical friend who agrees to marry Mr Collins after he is rejected by Lizzy because she’s 27 and it is her last chance.

Mr Wickham: Charming officer stationed at Merryton who captures the approval of everyone in the area, including Elizabeth.


What happens then?
The main plot revolves around the romantic lives of the Bennet sisters. Mr Bingley moves into the neighbourhood and immediately falls in love with Jane. His friend, Mr Darcy, first dismisses Elizabeth but soon grows to like her ‘fine eyes’ as well as other attributes. Meanwhile, Lizzy decides that she detests him and goes about her daily business which includes batting off proposals from her obsequious cousin Mr Collins, dealing with her mother’s ‘nerves’ and getting to know a dashing young soldier called Wickham.

Bingley gets bundled off to town by his family and Darcy, separating him from Jane and plunging her into despair. Lizzy visits her friend, Charlotte where she finally gets to meet the great Lady Catherine de Bourgh of Rosings Park, who just happens to be Darcy’s aunt and look, he’s visiting! Then Darcy really puts his foot in it by delivering the worst thought out proposal of all time. Opening with: ‘In vain have I struggled. It will not do. My feelings will not be repressed’ before sliding into a verse on how her connections are a degradation to his standing in life and rounding up by once again stressing that he has very sensibly tried to convince his heart to listen to his snooty head, but it wouldn’t so they should probably get married then?

Of course, he’s rejected and slinks off, but not before handing over a letter to Lizzy that proves that Wickham is an old fashioned cad who tried to have his wicked way with Darcy’s fifteen year old sister but was stopped just in time. So Lizzy does a complete u-turn on her opinions about both Darcy and Wickham.

After a pit stop at Longbourne, Lizzy goes gallivanting around the Lake district with relatives. She ends up visiting Pemberley, Darcy’s ancestral home and realises just how many bonnets £10,000 a year can buy her. Surprise, surprise: just as they are leaving, who should turn up but Mr Darcy, who seems much more friendly than usual. Just as they’re getting along, a letter arrives saying that Lydia (their youngest, stupidest sister) has run off with Wickham, before they are married- scandal!

As the family all despair at their loss of respectability, Mrs Bennet’s brother saves the day, finds the errant pair and forces them to marry. Except the real hero of the day is Darcy, who stumbles upon Elizabeth just as she receives the bad news and rides off to London to save the fair maid from distress whilst swearing everyone to secrecy about his part in events.

Big mouth Lydia lets slip to Lizzy that, actually it’s Darcy who’s the hero, so when Lady Catherine de Bourgh shows up all guns blazing because she heard a rumour that Lizzy was engaged to Darcy, she tells her to get stuffed and refuses to promise that she won’t marry him. Mr Bingley pops up to propose to Jane and when Elizabeth and Darcy are thrown together again, they can finally declare undying love and all the sensible characters get their happy ending. Hooray!

What else?

Is there a Film Version?
Several, but the general consensus is that Andrew Davies’ television adaptation starring Jennifer Ehle and Cloin Firth is the closest to the spirit of the book. Pride and Prejudice has single handedly created the costume drama genre of television and has therefore helped to feed generations of poor, malnourished thespians.

Things the Fans Say
  • I am Elizabeth Bennet.
  • Keira Knightley is way too pretty to be cast as Lizzy! She’s meant to be averagely pretty cough*and therefore her life is more attainable for an ordinary person like me* cough cough.
  • Oh Mr Darcy!
  • Ha! Take that Caroline Bingley!
  • Don’t do it Charlotte!

Random Facts
  • Darcy doesn’t dive into a pond in the book: that was the BBC director taking advantage of Colin Firth’s excitable fan base.
  •  The original title was First Impressions but it was published anonymously as Pride and Prejudice in 1813.
  • There have been SO MANY spin offs and re-imaginings of this book including Bridget Jones and of course, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies which is currently being made into a film.


*The picture used is for the Cheat Sheet logo is a scan of my copy of a Peguin Classics edition and all cover design and pictures used remain the property of their respective owners :)

    Saturday 27 August 2011

    The Great Edinburgh Book Sculpture Mystery


    Photo by Robert Burdock , who also has an amusing Twitter feed
    A real life mystery worthy of the most intricate plots has been slowly playing out in Edinburgh. If you’ve been lucky enough to visit the Edinburgh Book Festival this year, you may have spotted an intricate paper sculpture or two which have appeared overnight, left by an anonymous source (see picture).

    The intricate sculptures, each crafted from an individual book, show a figure dwarfed by trees which was titled Lost (albeit in a good book) which was crafted from a copy of James Hogg’s Confessions of a Justified Sinner and a rather lovely tea tray featuring a cupcake and cup with the message ‘this cup is awarded to @edbookfest’ (the Twitter name of the festival).

    These sculptures are just the latest gifts from the anonymous donor, who has left several sculptures around the city this summer. The early sculptures seemed to be a collection which celebrated Ian Rankin’s popular Rebus series (which are based in Edinburgh) and were left in places of literary note around the city. The Scottish Storytelling Centre now displays a sculpture of a hatching dragon’s egg which they discovered on their premises, the Filmhouse received a miniature cinema complete with charging horses coming out of the screen, the Scottish Poetry Library was gifted a witty ‘Poetree’ and the National Library of Scotland have been the recipients of a delicate gramophone and coffin protruding from a copy of Rankin’s Exit Music. All of the sculptures so far have included a note which states that the sculptures have been created and given to the specific institutions:
    ‘In support of libraries, books, words, ideas…’. 
    All of the tags are handwritten and seem to be in the same handwriting, suggesting that all the sculptures have been created by the same person.

    The creator of these mini masterpieces is yet to come forward, despite heavy media coverage. So what are the clues we do have?

    • Well, the Edinburgh Book sculptor obviously has links to the city, 
    • is a fan of the arts and culture scene, 
    • understands the link between Edinburgh and certain pieces of literature 
    • and is, more than likely, an Ian Rankin fan. 

    Rankin himself has denied any responsibility for the sculptures, which goes someway to rule out a novel marketing campaign (pun not intended).

    A quick Google search for 'book sculptures' and 'Scotland' brought up a litany of names, including Su Blackwell (who has a rather funky site displaying her gorgeous works which you can visit here) Georgia Russell , and many more outside of Scotland including the American, Brian Dettmer, which just goes to show the popularity of the medium. Whilst the list of worldwide professional artist’s names continues to grow, there is no evidence to discount a previously unknown amateur as being responsible for the sculptures.  

    Whilst the odds are on a British/Scottish artist being revealed as the mystery sculptor, there is still no solid proof about their identity until the sculptor chooses to reveal themselves. I think in this case, I’m quite happy for the mystery to remain unsolved. What is important, is remembering the gesture behind the gifts. As their accompanying note cards say, they were made in respect of literature, libraries, ideas and culture: a sentiment that I heartily agree with. Looking at the beautiful paper marvels themselves, it almost doesn’t matter who made them, just that they were made at all.

    If you’d like to see all the mystery sculptures in their full glory, click the link below:  http://community.thisiscentralstation.com/_Mysterious-paper-sculptures/blog/4991767/126249.html

    EDIT 4TH NOVEMBER 2011:

    ReaditRibbit has moved! Check out the new blog here

    Sunday 21 August 2011

    Judging a Book by It's Cover?

    Everyone knows the old adage about not picking books based on their packaging, but do you heed this advice? I will openly admit to being drawn to the siren’s call of a beautiful book cover (although I still maintain that only the content of the book determines if I actually read it or not) and will actually cross a room to further admire said works of art.

    A quick detour into my local Waterstone’s yesterday then, left me in a state of general feverishness tinged with despair. Long term readers of this blog will know that since the beginning of this year, I have forsworn buying books until I have actually read all those I currently own in a vain attempt to cure both my book addiction and alleviate some of the stress from my groaning bookshelves. This decision has meant that any visit I have made to a bookstore this year has been a bizarre source of personal torture and yesterday was no exception to that rule. As I looked wide eyed at all the lovely, lovely new books, I noticed a strange trend in the stacks of paperbacks and walls lined with glistening hardbacks. Everywhere I turned there were sets of previously unrelated books, reprinted in attractive, unifying styles.

    Whilst it has been common practice for publishers to reissue old classics with modern covers and designs, it seems that in recent years, the trend of reprinting in order to create new, highly desirable collections has blossomed. Take for instance these gorgeous, graffiti cover designs for the Penguin Ink collection. It’s not often that you’d see Will Self’s The Book of Dave and Zoe Heller’s Notes On a Scandal categorised together, but thanks to these new designs, they’ll be forever linked. Penguin’s website mentions that the designs were made by some of the world’s leading tattoo artists, but is curiously silent on why such a disparate collection of British books deserves to be redesigned in this particular way. 

    Meanwhile, as the lead picture to this post shows, Vintage have been celebrating twenty one years in the business and have reissued 21 of their top selling titles in block colour to celebrate the fact. Altogether, they make a lovely rainbow effect. Here, the collection has a defined purpose: to make people aware of the depth and range of their signings over the last two decades. Likewise, one can argue that the Penguin cloth bound classics fulfil the same purpose, providing relatively affordable copies of the classic £1 and £2 titles in a more enduring binding. But these are all positive points for the consumer, what about the other side of the coin?

    Wuthering Heights re-interpreted for the Twilight generation
    Creating a new collection from old material can be a very canny move for publishers. Not only does it open up the book to potential new audiences with aesthetically pleasing covers, it can also highlight different aspects of the books better than any marketing campaign ever could. Just think, would Wuthering Heights have started creeping back into store bestseller lists if it wasn’t for the cunning publisher who noted the reference in the hugely popular Twilight Saga and had it and other classic novels republished to resemble Meyer’s series? Ok, so a little part of me died inside on learning that giving it a black cover with a soppy lily was the only way to market a classic to the Emo generation but hey, if it gets teenagers to read literature, it can only be a good thing.

    Whilst most of us big kids would like to feel we’re too sophisticated for a cheap trick like that to fool us, there are some exceptions to the rule. From my own experiences as a bookseller, I often saw covers to tie in with film adaptations sell much better than the normal covers: even when displayed side by side.

    Then there are the collections which I mentioned earlier, all of which are designed to appeal in bulk. Some book series have even been known to combine together so that their spines spell out a message or make a picture when placed in the right order. Most of us have had the need to collect the ‘full set’ ingrained into us by hard nosed marketing campaigns for years: one day its football cards, the next it’s the Faber and Faber Twentieth Century Greats collection.* Seeing how lovely all the books in a particular collection look as they’re displayed together in the bookshop would fill even the most casual book buyer with longing through this kind of conditioning alone. Everyone likes feeling that they haven’t missed out, that the collection is complete. Logically, its complete nonsense, but nevertheless, I for one am aware of falling prey to the consumerist trap of wanting them all, just because they exist. I’d like to think that there is some deep, psychological reasoning behind this (like the tendency to overeat because the caveman part of our DNA says ‘See food: eat it’ because it hasn’t yet learned to accept the existence of 24 hour supermarkets) but it’s probably just further evidence of my book addiction.


    The cynical view might be to think that repackaging bestsellers is an attempt to wring more profit out of publishing back catalogues in times of economic hardship. Whilst you can certainly make that argument, I think that a stronger secondary motive behind the trend is at work, one which will only help ensure the survival of the printed book. As sales of electronic books rise, it has become apparent that the major differences between a printed book and a digital copy is the added visual and tactile power of it's binding. A book, for example, can colour co-ordinate with the décor, but a Kindle (or any other type of e-reader) could never add value to a room in the same kind of way.
    Beautiful book covers may in time prove to be the saviour of the printed word. For now, they stand as the first thing which draws a potential reader to another world and, if done well, can represent in a single page design the content and spirit of the hundreds of pages of writing it adorns. A beautiful book cover is not always indicative of a beautiful book, but all beautiful book covers remind us of why we covet them so much: the simple, unalloyed joy of reading.
                                                                                                             

    * Or something to that effect.

    Wednesday 10 August 2011

    Review: Out - Natsuo Kirino


    They say you shouldn’t judge a book by its cover, but it was precisely the cover that drew me to Out. It’s striking in its simplicity and pretty much tells you everything you need to know about the plot.

    I had wanted to pick this up for ages, but never seemed to get round to it. I’ve even managed to read Kirino’s Grotesque previously, even though Out had been in British bookstores for longer. Out was the first English translation of Kirino’s books to be published. Set in her native Japan, it’s a hard hitting crime novel that is not for the faint of heart.

    Following four female colleagues who work the graveyard shift making boxed lunches, the plot soon dives into the seedy underworld of suburban Tokyo. All four of the women have very different but equally difficult home lives until the young housewife Yaoi, murders her husband in retaliation for his mistreatment of her and her two young children. Panicking, she calls her friend and colleague, Masako, to help her. Before long Masako has roped in their friends ‘The Skipper’ and Kuniko to help dismember and dispose of the body. It seems they’ve got away with it, until that is, bags of body parts are found in a local park and the police start asking them questions…

    As you can probably tell, it’s a pretty intense book. There are some incredibly graphic descriptions and subject matters and I found myself wincing more than once. As I’d read Kirino before, I knew it wasn’t going to be an easy ride but no amount of mental preparation dulls the power of these scenes. Whilst the subject matter is undoubtedly dark, Kirino does not glorify in these scenes. Rather, we watch as the four women get sucked further and further into a murky world, as their lives slowly unravel, as they try to cope with the mental and spiritual scars they have inflicted on themselves. As the net pulls in around them, the atmosphere becomes unbearably tense, with the feeling that retribution is just around the corner.

    Kirino creates realistic characters, worn down from years of drudgery. It’s a bleak view of the world, yet she never lapses into polarisation. Even the most repulsive characters like Kuniko and the lone shark Satake are complex and there are moments where I felt genuine pity for both. Likewise, the characters painted as mostly good (the put upon and the misunderstood) show realistic slivers of steel and undercurrents of cruelty, demonstrating that in Kirino’s world, as in life, good people can sometimes to bad things.

    Although often disturbing, the narrative pulls you into turning the pages and I found myself genuinely caring if the women would get away with their crime or not. Kirino knows exactly when and how to amp up the tension, depicting slow burn scenes where nothing much happens accept the characters wondering how much longer they have left before they’re found out. In some ways, it’s quite an internal book with the main characters taking turns to share with us their point of view, their interactions with others dulled by the events they have witnessed and taken part in.

    Due to the subject matter, I felt as if I didn’t want to spend too much time in the book lest the characters dark views started wearing off onto me. Finishing the book is like rising out of a murky pool: you feel like you need a mental shower to make yourself clean again. The grubby, sordid tale is so realistic and well written, that although you may not spend a very long time with the characters, you’ll carry the story around for much longer.

    Despite my squeamishness, it’s a brilliantly daring novel: I doubt very much that you’ll have read anything similar. Unlike most crime novels, there are no hero detectives, no fiendishly clever, morally straight protagonists to root for. Kirino spins the situation on its head in that you’re essentially rooting for the criminals. Nothing is black or white in this world and everything is complicated.

    Out is a compellingly tense psychological thriller that will leave you questioning your own morality: it’s a fairly quick read, but is not an easy one. If I were you, I’d line up a nice, light-hearted comedy to read straight afterwards, trust me, you’ll need it.

    Saturday 6 August 2011

    Review: China Witness- Xinran

    I’ve been reading my beautiful, hardback copy of Xinran’s latest book for around two years now, a chapter at a time in between novels and FINALY finished it this week.

    Based on twenty years of experiences and interviews, China Witness is a combination of history and biography following Xue Xinran as she attempts to gain a better understanding of the generations that came before her own: the generations of Chinese people who lived through the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution.

    Oral history has traditionally received a bad rap from the academic world. After all, human memories are subjective and various studies have proven without a doubt that they are mutable and susceptible to change. I won’t go into this debate in detail, suffice to say that recent students of history tend to think that ALL history is subjective to some degree but as human life tends to be subjective, think that it is inevitable that the study of history is bound to be littered with contrasting opinions.  More to the point, oral history has been the preferred method of passing down events by those who cannot leave their story for future generations in any other format. Not only has Oral history been an important tool for accessing the opinions and memories of those who are not educated, but it has also provided a platform for those without social or economic power and those who have views that are opposed, repressed and suppressed by their respective sources of power. Oral history then can be a very effective way to glean information that otherwise would have been forgotten.

    Xinran’s China Witness is based around this concept. Whilst the rest of the world has since been made aware of the horrors and hardships of living in China under the leadership of Mao Zedong, it is still extremely rare to hear first hand accounts from the ordinary people who were his contemporaries. Interviewing everyone from taxi drivers and lantern makers to a female PLA General, Xinran leaves no stone unturned in her efforts to gain a better insight into her parent’s generation.

    Her interviewing style is very personal. Often, we are told, she merely waits. She chats generally, allowing her interviewees to relax and reveal their often suppressed memories and feelings. The interviews are presented in transcript format, complete with inconsequential details and painstaking descriptions of the physical manifestations of the fear and pain which stirring up old memories cause.

    Despite these barriers, a number of the ‘witnesses’ here give frank and open accounts of their past roles in society. However, there is still a tendency for Xinran to ignore her journalistic instinct on the occasions when the person she is talking to is evasive or skirts around an issue. Her failure to probe deeper is often explained away as an unavoidable side effect of showing deferential respect. She is at pains to point out the generational gap between herself and the people she talks to:  the majority of the people whose stories are recorded within China Witness are in the seventies and eighties and the Chinese culture is known for its deferential attitude towards its elders. In addition, this particular group of people lived through one of the most controlling societies in modern history, mainly because they learned to play by its rules, and kept their heads down and their thoughts to themselves. Considering the nature of the project, it is perhaps not surprising that Xinran chooses the softly softly approach, however, there are moments when you sense that the merest push might have revealed something more.

    One of the more harrowing accounts is that of Mr Chanzheng, a ninety year old survivor of the Long March. The accounts here are very restrained, often the language used is fairly subdued but even the toned down language cannot hide the horror of accounts like Mr Chanzheng’s when he reports loosing companions in the Lazi Kou Pass:

    ‘Some of our comrades didn’t take enough care coming down and they rolled over the edge and died! When I think back to all that, it makes me really, really sad. We never knew who would be next.’

    China Witness provides a fascinating insight into the history of modern China and the lives of ordinary Chinese people during an extraordinary period. Some of my favourite stories came from the everyday workers, who carried on living life as normally as possible despite increasing pressures to conform to new standards. The interview with the lantern-maker may not seem as relevant as that of the ex-policeman, but it is full of minor, charming details that paint an intimate picture of one man’s working life. These intimate portrayals of Chinese lives are what make China Witness stand out and ultimately mark its triumph.


    Wednesday 3 August 2011

    Bulwer-Lytton Worst Writing Award Announced

    'It was a dark and stormy night......' Photo by Ambro

    Imagine sweating for years over your magnum opus: painstakingly choosing each comma, each word, even which font your masterwork will be presented to the world in. Sounds like hard work doesn’t it? Spare a thought for American Authour, Sue Fondrie, who this week was awarded the Bulwer-Lytton prize for the worst sentence published this year.

    Although the name of the prize is not as well known as the Booker or the Costa Award, nearly everyone can quote the beginning of the first sentence to ever win the ‘accolade’:

    ‘It was a dark and stormy night when….’

    This line opened the 1830 novel, Paul Clifford written by English poet and novelist, Edward George Bulwer-Lytton. The prize was set up in 1980 by the English department of San Jose State University and named in Bulwer-Lytton’s honour.

    This year’s ‘winner’ was duly awarded the prize for the following sentence:

    ‘Cheryl’s mind turned like the vanes of a wind-powered turbine, chopping her sparrow-like thoughts into bloody pieces that fell onto a growing pile of forgotten memories.’

    Fondrie’s sentence is the shortest to ever win the top prize.

    What do you think? Have you heard worse? Answers on a postcard (or you can just leave a comment below and save yourself the postage).

    Tuesday 26 July 2011

    Man Booker Prize 2011 Longlist Announced

    The longlist for the 2011 Man Booker Prize was unveiled today. This year’s judging panel, chaired by former Director- General of MI5 Dame Stella Rimington, have chosen an eclectic thirteen titles from one hundred and thirty eight candidates including four debut novelists, three Canadian authors, three publishers who have never before had a title nominated, one previous winner in Alan Hollinghurst and three times (now four times) nominated Julian Barnes.

    Judges Stella Rimmington, editor of the Spectator Matthew d’Ancona, author Susan Hill, journalist and politician Chris Mullin and the Daily Telegraph’s Gaby Wood had the task of choosing the final diverse thirteen titles. Dame Stella commented:
    'We are delighted by the quality and breadth of our long list, which emerged from an impassioned discussion. The list ranges from the Wild West to multi-ethnic London via post-Cold War Moscow and Bucharest, and includes four first novels.' 
    Only four of the thirteen authors have featured on the long list previously: Hollinghurst who won the award in 2004 for The Line of Beauty, literary favourite Julian Barnes and Irish writer Sebastian Barry, who won the Costa Prize in 2009 with The Secret Scripture. Book makers are currently favouring Hollinghurst’s latest novel The Stranger’s Child to win the prize, offering odds of 5/1.

    This year’s longlist also promotes a marked shift towards smaller publishers, reflecting the changing face of the publishing industry. Welsh publisher Seren Books, Oxfordshire based Oneworld Publications and the Scottish Sandstone Press each have a title present in the longlist, drawing unprecedented attention to the blossoming trade in alternative and independent publishing.

    The 2010 prize was awarded to Howard Jacobson for his comic The Finkler Question. The 2011 short list will be announced on the 6th of September.

    The Man Booker Prize Longlist 2011

    • Julian Barnes - The Sense of an Ending - (Jonathan Cape -Random House) 3 previous nominations.
    • Sebastian Barry - On Canaan’s Side -  (Faber) 2 previous nominations.
    • Carol Birch -Jamrach’s Menagerie - (Canongate Books) 1 previous nomination
    • Patrick deWitt - The Sisters Brothers - ( Granta)
    • Esi Edugyan - Half Blood Blues - (Serpent’s Tail- Profile)
    • Yvette Edwards - A Cupboard Full of Coats - (Oneworld) Debut Novel
    • Alan Hollinghurst - The Stranger’s Child - (Picador- Pan Macmillan) 2 previous nominations
    • Stephen Kelman - Pigeon English - (Bloomsbury) Debut Novel
    • Patrick McGuinness - The Last Hundred Days - (Seren Books) Debut Novel
    • A.D. Miller – Snowdrops - (Atlantic) Debut Novel
    • Alison Pick - Far to Go - (Headline Review)
    • Jane Rogers - The Testament of Jessie Lamb - (Sandstone Press)
    • D.J. Taylor - Derby Day - (Chatto & Windus- Random House)

    Monday 25 July 2011

    Jack Reacher Scoops Lee Child Crime Writer of the Year Award

    Photo by Steve_C on Flickr
    Lee Child has been named as Crime Writer of the year award at the Harrogate Literary Festival with his latest novel 61 Hours.

    The popular writer of the Jack Reacher series of books was honoured by the Theakstons Old Peculier Crime Novel award this weekend. The fictional American crime detective has cemented Child’s reputation as a class crime writer; a copy of one of his Reacher series is sold every few seconds. Child is also the first British author to have sold over a million Amazon Kindle e-books. This popularity is set to soar higher with the release of a film based on the first Reacher book, One Shot, starring Tom Cruise as the hero.

    It is the first time Child has won the award, beating the likes of twice previous winner Mark Billingham, Tess Gerritsen and Linwood Barclay.

    The event also saw PD James honoured with a lifetime achievement award for her outstanding contribution to crime writing. Baroness James has been publishing crime novels for over fifty years with the her most famous detective, Adam Dalgliesh , featuring in her debut, Cover Her Face published in 1962.

    Tuesday 12 July 2011

    Samuel Johnson Prize Awarded to Mao's Great Famine

    Mao's image still looms large in modern China (photo by bokurdotnet)

    The BBC Samuel Johnson Prize for Non Fiction has been awarded to Frank Dikotter for his seminal work on the life and of Chairman Mao, titled Mao’s Great Famine. The Dutch historian beat five other short listed titles including a biography of Caravaggio and a study of Bismarck’s life to claim the £20,000 prize.

    Focusing on the so called ‘Great Leap Forward’ which took place between 1958 and 1962, the book studies Mao Zedong’s attempt to ‘overtake’ the British Economy within a fifteen year period which resulted in widespread hardship, famine and directly led to the death of over 45 million people.

    Chair of this year’s judging panel, Ben Macintyre, describes the Mao’s Great Famine as ‘ an epic record of human folly’, going as far as to claim that the study ‘casts Chinese history in a radical new light, with a devastating psychological portrait of the dictator’.

    The prize is the largest awarded for non fiction within the UK and is open to all non fiction genres.

    Each of the short listed authors (see below) also received £1000 in prize money for their titles.


    Samuel Johnson Prize for Non-Fiction 2011 Shortlist was:
    • Mao’s Great Famine by Frank Dikötter (Bloomsbury)
    • Caravaggio: A Life Sacred and Profane by Andrew Graham Dixon (Allen Lane)
    • Liberty’s Exiles by Maya Jasanoff (HarperPress)
    • The Rational Optimist by Matt Ridley (Fourth Estate)
    • Bismarck: A Life by Jonathan Steinberg (Oxford University Press)
    • Reprobates by John Stubbs (Viking)

    Saturday 9 July 2011

    Restless - William Boyd : Review


    A very modern spy novel, Restless won William Boyd the Costa Novel Award in 2006. Set across two time frames, it tells the story of a young woman recruited as a British Spy during the Second World War and the consequences of her actions as she relates her hidden past to her twenty something daughter in seventies Oxford. Switching between the past and the literary present, we learn more about the relationship between mother (Sally/ 
    Eva Delectorskaya) and daughter (Ruth Gilmartin) as well as the complicated web of history they find themselves in.

    Eva Delectroskaya is approached shortly after her beloved brother’s death by a British spy looking to utilise her international childhood and language skills in the upcoming war effort against Germany. Jump forward to 1976 to find Eva living a quiet life under the name of Sally Gilmartin, with no one, not even her daughter, knowing anything about her past life. Ruth is more than a little surprised to be handed a first hand account, a chapter at a time, of her mother’s past. Slowly, details unfold of the schemes and plots that Eva/Sally was involved in as it becomes apparent that her past is coming back to haunt her.

    Meanwhile, Ruth has been struggling with the fallout of her father’s sudden death which led her to flee to a progressive academic life in Germany and an affair with a married man that resulted in the birth of her son, Jochen. Stuck between writing a PHD on a subject she’s not very interested in and teaching English to foreign students to make ends meet, Ruth is pulled from her now boring existence into her mother’s intriguing past.

    For a novel with such a complex plotlines, it’s a surprisingly easy read. It would make an excellent beach read.  There’s a romantic sub-plot between Eva and the enigmatic man who recruited her, Romer, but above all else this is a spy novel, one that asks its readers to question the nature of trust and the motives of all the characters  found within it. The momentum of the story is fast: Ruth and in turn the reader, is exposed to revelation after revelation as Sally/Eva casually presents her with the next chapters in her story. Rather than disrupting the narrative flow, the choice to alternate the storylines by chapter aids in unravelling the complexities of Eva’s story. The much more sedate and mundane aspects of Ruth’s life allow a little breathing space from the intrigue and rich detail and often Ruth’s reactions to the latest chapter of her mother’s story help the reader tease out all of the important details which the latest instalment has revealed. This can sometimes lead to the Ruth story arc being overshadowed, despite having an interesting sub-plot about German political intrigue which could have been developed further. It’s a shame that all the intricacies of Ruth’s story suffer as a result, but Restless is Eva’s, not Ruth’s story and consequently, the main focus of attention is turned to her.

    A vastly entertaining read, Boyd keeps his readers on the edge of their seats in anticipation as he cleverly unravels events. The pacing throughout is flawless and building the plot around lesser known historical details of the activities of the British Secret Service before and during the Second World War adds an exciting twist to a time period and subject matter which has been used time and again.